Rechercher dans ce blog

Sunday, January 31, 2021

Chevron, Exxon Mobil executives discussed merger: WSJ - Fox Business

The chief executives of Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp spoke about combining the oil giants after the pandemic shook the world last year, according to people familiar with the talks, testing the waters for what could be one of the largest corporate mergers ever.

Continue Reading Below

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
XOM EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 44.83 -1.22 -2.65%
CVX CHEVRON CORP. 85.22 -3.79 -4.26%
COP CONOCOPHILLIPS INC. 40.03 -1.08 -2.63%
OXY OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION 20.06 -0.89 -4.25%
BP BP PLC 22.22 -0.64 -2.80%
RDS.A ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC 36.89 -1.35 -3.53%

Chevron Chief Executive Mike Wirth and Exxon CEO Darren Woods discussed a merger following the outbreak of the new coronavirus, which decimated oil and gas demand and put enormous financial strain on both companies, the people said. The discussions were described as preliminary and aren’t ongoing but could come back in the future, the people said.

EXXON MOBIL STEPS BACK FROM PLAN TO INCREASE SPENDING, PREPARING TO SLASH ASSETS BOOK VALUE

Such a deal would reunite the two largest descendants of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil monopoly, which was broken up by U.S. regulators in 1911, and reshape the oil industry.

A combined company’s market value could top $350 billion. Exxon has a market value of $190 billion, while Chevron’s is $164 billion. Together, they would likely form the world’s second largest oil company by market capitalization and production, producing about 7 million barrels of oil and gas a day, based on pre-pandemic levels, second only in both measures to Saudi Aramco.

But a merger of the two largest American oil companies could encounter regulatory and antitrust challenges under the Biden administration. President Biden has said climate change is one of the biggest crises the country faces. In October, he said he would push the country to “transition away from the oil industry.” He hasn’t been as vocal about antitrust matters, and the administration has yet to nominate the Justice Department’s head of that division.

One of the people familiar with the talks said the sides may have missed an opportunity to consummate the deal under former President Donald Trump, whose administration was seen as more friendly to the industry.

Exxon Mobil Chairman & CEO Darren Woods discussed a merger with Chevron executive Mike Wirth during talks with last year. (Mark Schiefelbein/Pool/Getty Images)

A handful of sizable oil and gas deals were completed last year, including Chevron’s $5 billion takeover of Noble Energy Inc. and ConocoPhillips COP ’ roughly $10 billion takeover of Concho Resources Inc., but nothing close to the scale of combining San Ramon, Calif.-based Chevron and Irving, Texas-based Exxon. Such a deal would significantly surpass in size the mega-oil-mergers of the late 1990s and early 2000s, which included the combination of Exxon and Mobil and Chevron and Texaco Inc.

It also could be the largest corporate tie-up ever, depending on its structure. That distinction now belongs to the roughly $181 billion purchase of German conglomerate Mannesmann AG by Vodafone AirTouch PLC in 2000, according to Dealogic.

CHEVRON WORKERS FACE DEMANDS TO REAPPLY FOR JOBS UNDER GLOBAL RESTRUCTURING - SOURCES

Many investors, analysts and energy executives have called for consolidation in the beleaguered oil-and-gas industry, arguing that cutting costs and improving operational efficiencies would help companies weather the pandemic-induced downturn and prepare for an uncertain future as many countries seek to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels to combat climate change.

In an interview discussing Chevron’s earnings Friday, Mr. Wirth, who like Mr. Woods also serves as his company’s board chairman, said that consolidation could make the industry more efficient. He was speaking generally and not about a possible Exxon-Chevron merger.

“As for larger scale things, it’s happened before,” Mr. Wirth said, referring to the 1990s and early-2000s megamergers. “Time will tell.”

Paul Sankey, an independent analyst who hypothesized a merger of Chevron and Exxon in October, estimated at the time that the combined company would have a market capitalization of about $300 billion and $100 billion in debt. A merger would allow them to cut a combined $15 billion in administrative expenses and $10 billion in annual capital expenditures, he wrote.

Exxon was America’s most valuable company seven years ago, with a market value of more than $400 billion, nearly double Chevron’s. But Exxon has fallen from its heights following a series of strategic missteps, which were further exacerbated by the pandemic. It has been eclipsed as a profit engine by tech giants such as Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., in recent years and was removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average last year for the first time since it was added as Standard Oil of New Jersey in 1928.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Its market capitalization is now about one-quarter that of electric-car maker Tesla Inc., which has a market value of about $752 billion.

Exxon’s shares have fallen nearly 29% over the last year, while Chevron’s are down about 20%. Chevron briefly topped Exxon in market capitalization in the fall.

Exxon endured one of its worst financial performances ever in 2020. It is expected to report a fourth consecutive quarterly loss for the first time in modern history on Tuesday and already has posted more than $2 billion in losses through the first three quarters of 2020.

Chevron also has struggled, reporting nearly $5.5 billion in 2020 losses Friday. But investors have expressed more faith in Chevron because it entered the downturn with a stronger balance sheet—in part because it walked away from its $33 billion bid to buy Anadarko Petroleum Corp. before the pandemic, having been outbid by Occidental Petroleum Corp. in 2019.

Exxon has about $69 billion in debt as of September, while Chevron has around $35 billion, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Some investors have grown increasingly concerned about Exxon’s direction under Mr. Woods as the company faces a rapidly changing energy industry and growing global consciousness about climate change. Some are also worried that Exxon may have to cut its hefty dividend, which costs it about $15 billion annually, due to its high debt levels. Many individual investors count on the payments as a source of income.

Mr. Woods embarked on an ambitious plan in 2018 to spend $230 billion to pump an additional one million barrels of oil and gas a day by 2025. But before the pandemic, production was up only slightly and Exxon’s financial flexibility was diminished. In November, Exxon retreated from the plan and said it would cut billions of dollars from its capital spending every year through 2025 and focus on investing in only the most promising assets.

Meanwhile, the company’s woes have helped draw the attention of activist investors. One of them, Engine No. 1 LLC, has argued that the company should focus more on investments in clean energy while cutting costs elsewhere to preserve its dividend. The firm nominated four directors to Exxon’s board Wednesday and called for it to make strategic changes to its business plan. Exxon also has been in talks with another activist, D.E. Shaw Group, and is preparing to announce one or more new board members, additional spending cuts and investments in new technologies to help it reduce its carbon emissions.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Rivals such as BP PLC and Royal Dutch Shell PLC have embarked on bold strategies to remake their business as regulatory and investor pressure to reduce carbon emissions mounts. Both have said they will invest heavily in renewable energy—a strategy that their investors so far haven’t rewarded.

Exxon and Chevron haven’t invested substantially in renewables, instead choosing to double down on oil and gas. Both companies have argued that the world will need vast amounts of fossil fuels for decades to come, and that they can capitalize on current underinvestment in oil production.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Chevron, Exxon Mobil executives discussed merger: WSJ - Fox Business )
https://ift.tt/2MFt8yL
Business

Silver futures jump 7% as Reddit traders try their squeeze play with the metal - CNBC

A one kilogram gold bar sits on top of silver bars at London bullion dealers Gold Investments in this arranged photograph in London, United Kingdom, on April 4, 2013.
Simon Dawson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Futures contracts for silver surged higher on Sunday night as the Reddit-fueled boom in highly shorted stocks appears to be spilling over into the metals market.

Silver futures were up 8% shortly after the futures market opened, marking the biggest move in the futures since at least 2013. The contracts last traded up 6.8%.

The sharp move higher builds off gains for silver and silver-related equities late last week. Silver mining stocks Coeur Mining and Pan American Silver rose 16.9% and 14.7%, respectively, on Thursday and Friday. The iShares Silver Trust jumped 6.7% during those two sessions.

The spike in demand for silver appears to be related to retail traders in the Reddit forum WallStreetBets, which has helped drive trading activity in heavily shorted stocks like GameStop and AMC Entertainment in recent weeks.

The forum had multiple active threads dedicated to silver on Sunday night. The phrase "#silversqueeze" was also trending on Twitter.

The move in silver was touted by investors who are bullish on cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which see the new digital assets in part as replacements for traditional metals.

Cameron Winklevoss, co-founder of cryptocurrency firm Gemini, said on twitter that, "The ramifications of a #silversqueeze cannot be underestimated. If it's exposed that there are more paper claims on silver than actual silver, not only would payoff be enormous, but gold would be next. #Bitcoin fixes this."

The dramatic spikes in GameStop and other heavily shorted stocks were due in part to a short squeeze, which is a phenomenon where investors who have bet against a stock are forced to buy shares to cover their positions as the name moves higher.

Melvin Capital, one of the hedge funds who originally had short positions in GameStop, lost 53% in January.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Silver futures jump 7% as Reddit traders try their squeeze play with the metal - CNBC )
https://ift.tt/3r9TLKZ
Business

Microsoft seeks to fill void if Google exits Australia: reports - Yahoo News

Microsoft has a "Plan B available" if Google follows through on threats to leave Australia over plans to compel digital giants to pay news organisations for content, local media reported Monday.

Australia's government has designed a mandatory news media bargaining code that would force Facebook and Google to compensate local publishers for hosting news stories on their platforms.

Both US tech firms have threatened to block key services in Australia if the new law goes ahead.

Google Australia managing director Mel Silva last week told a parliamentary inquiry the company would withdraw its popular Search function from Australia if the code becomes law.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella contacted Prime Minister Scott Morrison within days to make clear Microsoft's Bing search engine could expand if Google exits, The Australian reported.

The pair spoke last week, the newspaper said, with Nadella reportedly saying Microsoft had a "Plan B available".

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has confirmed the call, saying the government was in detailed discussions with "players across the industry".

Australia has reserved the right to impose the code on other platforms and it is unclear whether Microsoft's MSN service, which links to local news stories, could be affected in the future.

"With respect to the current controversy over a potential code of conduct governing Google and Facebook, Microsoft is not directly involved and we wouldn't want to comment on that ongoing process," a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has also been lobbying Australia, contacting Frydenberg last week to discuss the code and its impact on the social media giant.

Frydenberg told the ABC it was a "very constructive discussion" but "Zuckerberg didn't convince me to back down".

Facebook has warned it could block Australian users from sharing local news stories on its platform.

"I don't dismiss the threats but I'm not intimidated by them either," Frydenberg said.

"What I do know is that media businesses should be paid for content. And what I do know is that... whether it's on this issue, whether it's on cyber bullying or terrorist content on the internet, we have been prepared to take on the digital giants."

The law would require Google and Facebook to strike commercial agreements with news organisations or enter mandatory arbitration over the size of payments if they fail to agree.

The world-first proposal is being closely watched as governments grapple with how best to curb the growing power of tech giants.

While it has attracted wide backing from local media outlets, the US government has urged Australia to abandon the "burdensome" plan and World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee has warned it could make the internet "unworkable".

hr/arb/rma

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Microsoft seeks to fill void if Google exits Australia: reports - Yahoo News )
https://ift.tt/3rbO0g2
Business

Hedge fund manager who fell 'victim' to GameStop frenzy is expanding his $44m Miami Beach mansion - Daily Mail

'Victim' of the GameStop frenzy is building a bigger mansion: Hedge fund manager worth $300M is knocking down Miami Beach house next door to build tennis courts - even though his company lost 53% in value in January

  • Gabe Plotkin bought two waterfront Miami Beach houses in November
  • The Portland, Maine-born hedge fund manager is hoping to knock one down
  • Plotkin's New York City firm, Melvin, suffered massive losses due to GameStop
  • In January his fund was down 53pc and lost $4.5 billion in value 
  • Gary Kusin, who founded GameStop, said: 'I just grabbed some popcorn' 

A hedge fund manager who suffered massive losses as part of the GameStop feeding frenzy is in the midst of expanding his $44 million Miami Beach home, it has emerged, as the founder of GameStop spoke of his bemusement amid the saga.

Gabe Plotkin, who founded Melvin Capital Management in 2014, has seen his company lose 53 per cent of its value in January - in large part due to the GameStop trades. 

Plotkin, worth an estimated $300 million, according to Forbes, had bet that the shares would decrease in value: instead they soared, as amateur investors egged on on a Reddit forum began forcing the price up.

His company was worth $12.5 billion at the start of the year, The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday, and now runs more than $8 billion.

Gabe Plotkin has seen his company, Melvin Capital, lost 53 per cent over the course of January

Gabe Plotkin has seen his company, Melvin Capital, lost 53 per cent over the course of January

Plotkin had betted heavily on GameStop's share price declining: instead it soared

Plotkin had betted heavily on GameStop's share price declining: instead it soared

Melvin Capital exited its position in GameStop after having to raise additional funds, Plotkin confirmed to CNBC last week.

Gary Kusin told CNBC he had watched with interest as his company's value soared

Gary Kusin told CNBC he had watched with interest as his company's value soared

Gary Kusin, who founded GameStop in the 1980s, told CNBC it was 'a little bit of an honor' that investors targeted GameStop for its short-squeeze attempt.

'I'm much more a spectator than I am participant,' he added. 'I just grabbed some popcorn.'

Gary Kusin's son Ben had been an active member on the Reddit forum cheering on the company's spectacular rally. 

He told CNBC his father and brother have been actively watching the drama unfold as GameStop shares skyrocketed as much as 2,000 per cent month-to-date.

'It was worlds colliding when this went down,' Ben Kusin said.

As Plotkin came to terms with his losses, he was in the midst of serious work on his Miami property.

Plotkin paid $44 million in November for two neighboring homes in Miami

Plotkin paid $44 million in November for two neighboring homes in Miami

The area surrounding Plotkin's property is home to Cindy Crawford and Josh Kushner

The area surrounding Plotkin's property is home to Cindy Crawford and Josh Kushner 

Plotkin paid $44 million for the two adjacent homes at 6342 and 6360 North Bay Road, Miami, in November, The Real Deal revealed last year.

The Portland, Maine-born financier is planning to knock down the 1935 house that he bought for $12 million and replace it with a lighted tennis court.

The Real Deal reported that his attorney is expected to go before the Miami Beach Design Review Board next week.

Plans filed with the city show that Plotkin plans to keep the mansion at 6360 North Bay Road and replace the waterfront house next door with amenity courts, a new 1,316-square-foot cabana, a children's playground and open space.

Plotkin married Yaara Bank-Plotkin in 2006, and the pair split their time between New York City, where they are active in their Upper East Side synagogue, and Florida.

Plotkin has high-powered neighbors in the affluent area of Miami.

Among those living nearby are billionaire hedge fund manager Dan Loeb, Cindy Crawford and husband Rande Gerber, and Karlie Kloss and Josh Kushner.

Plotkin, who graduated in economics from Northwestern University in 2001, worked for several hedge funds before joining Steve Cohen's Connecticut-based SAC Capital in 2006.

He was considered one of Cohen's star protegees, until leaving to start his own New York-based firm in 2014.

On January 25, as Melvin hemorrhaged money, Cohen's firm Point72 Asset Management and another firm, Citadel LLC, injected $2.75 billion into Plotkin's hedge fund.

Hedge fund returns at Citadel fell three per cent for the month, according to The New York Times - about a third of which was caused by a $2 billion investment it made in Melvin about a week ago, according two people briefed on Citadel's results.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Hedge fund manager who fell 'victim' to GameStop frenzy is expanding his $44m Miami Beach mansion - Daily Mail )
https://ift.tt/3owVrN3
Business

Robinhood to continue trading limits on Monday, customers can still only buy one GameStop share - CNBC

The GameStop Corp. logo on a laptop computer and Robinhood application on a smartphone.
Tiffany Hagler-Geard | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Robinhood will continue to limit trading on Monday in short-squeeze names like GameStop that have experienced explosive rallies and unprecedented volatility over the past week.

Customers can only buy one share of GameStop's stock and five options contracts. However, the millennial-favored stock trading app did cut down its list of restricted stocks from as many as 50 on Friday to eight starting Monday.

"The table below shows the maximum number of shares and options contracts to which you can increase your positions," Robinbood said in a updated help center message Sunday. "These limits may be subject to change throughout the day."

The eight names are GameStop, AMC Entertainment, BlackBerry, Koss, Express, Nokia, Genius Brands International and Naked Brand Group. Robinhood is also limiting buying of options contracts in those securities.

If traders already hold more shares or contracts than the limits listed above, their positions will not be sold or closed, but they will not be able to open new positions, Robinhood said.

The move to extend restrictions came after Robinhood revealed that the central Wall Street clearinghouse mandated a ten-fold increase in the firm's deposit requirements last week to ensure orderly settlements. Clearinghouses seek to protect investors and the markets by making sure that brokerages have the funds needed for trade settlement, a process that takes two days.

The firm also raised margin requirements, or the amount of money in a client's account when they will be using leverage to buy a security.

The popular trading platform tapped credit lines and raised $1 billion new funds from investors to meet the clearinghouse requirements last week.

A speculative buying frenzy swept Wall Street last week as a new wave of stay-at-home traders continue to use social media, in this case Reddit's WallStreetBets forum, to coordinate massive short squeezes. Shares of GameStop, a struggling brick-and-mortar video game retailer, skyrocketed 400% in the past week, closing out January with a 1,625% rally. AMC soared 277% last week, while Koss ripped more than 1,800% higher.

Many on Wall Street grew increasingly worried that this retail mania will cause more pain for brokers like Robinhood and the short squeezes will force big hedge funds to sell other positions to raise cash, creating turmoil in the broader market.

Stock futures were down in early trading Sunday.

Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis, and live business day programming from around the world.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Robinhood to continue trading limits on Monday, customers can still only buy one GameStop share - CNBC )
https://ift.tt/3pFd2DC
Business

Reddit WallStreetBets Founder Calls GameStop Stock Frenzy A 'Symbolic Movement' - NPR

Day traders on the Reddit community r/WallStreetBets, founded by Jaime Rogozinski, drove up the price of GameStop and other stocks, setting up a standoff with Wall Street. Brent Lewin/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Brent Lewin/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Jaime Rogozinski says he saw the GameStop chaos coming.

"It's fascinating to watch," said the founder and former moderator of WallStreetBets, the now-famous Reddit online forum that recently sent shares of GameStop, AMC and other beleaguered companies soaring in a battle with hedge funds betting the shares would fall.

"This is a great conversation that the whole world is having right now," he said in an interview with All Things Considered.

The amateur day traders who banded together to fuel a short squeeze on the video game retailer, inflicting enormous losses for hedge funds, are part of a "symbolic movement," Rogozinski said.

"It's the democratization of financial markets, it's giving a voice to the people that didn't previously have one," he added.

The rise in free online trading platforms like Robinhood and the instant connection afforded by Internet communities like WallStreetBets combined to create this moment.

Rogozinski, a 39-year-old who now lives in Mexico City, founded the Reddit community in 2012. Back then, while working as an IT consultant in Washington, D.C., he had a "decent disposable income" to play with in the stock market.

He said he was "was looking for a place where we could discuss high-risk, high-return trades with the market. In the absence of finding one, I decided to create it."

In the years following, the Robinhood app transformed the online brokerage industry. With zero trading fees and a game-like interface, the startup made the stock market more accessible to a young user base. By 2019, a wave of online brokerages — including E-Trade, Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade — had followed Robinhood's model in dropping commissions.

But regulators and Wall Street haven't kept up with the times, Rogozinski said.

He said there are "absurdities" in the market and "a lot of systemic weaknesses." Until now, he said, "nobody's done anything to address it that's been symbolic. And my way of protesting is to try and push it to the extreme."

At the same time, he said he didn't want these scenarios to happen on his watch.

"It's a bit of bittersweet because if I were still moderator, this wouldn't have happened," said Rogozinski, who hasn't been a moderator since last April.

Rogozinski said he has watched members try to game the market en masse before. But, deeming it too much of a legal risk, he said he put a stop to it when questionable behavior arose.

"I had lawyers, I consulted with them, I said, 'I don't know is this legal, is it not legal.' I'm not quite sure. They said, 'Look, you could turn it illegal if you say certain things or do certain things, but it's kind of a gray area, no precedent, '" Rogozinski said.

He chose the conservative route, he said, blocking "all subsequent efforts."

"I didn't want to risk the community," he said.

He shut down a private offshoot forum on the Discord chat app and booted other moderators on the Reddit forum for allowing hate speech to go unchecked, according to The Wall Street Journal.

While Rogozinski said that he's enjoying "watching everything from the sidelines," he doesn't appear to be rooting for any one team.

"You have voices on one side — 'let's protect the little guys' — and you have voices on the other side that said 'the system is breaking,' " he said. "They're both right."

Day traders on Robinhood who drove up GameStop and other stocks exploited a weakness in an archaic financial system, Rogozinski said. Wall Street, initially started as a way to raise capital, has "been slowly creeping away from their original intention," he said.

"Companies that used to go public to raise funds to be able to innovate, ... now they raise funds before they go public and they go public just to pay back the investors," he added.

On the other hand, Rogozinski said, "For too long it's been an invite-only club. And it's been the elites on Wall Street and nobody on Main Street."

What's happening now, he said, invokes the same sentiments of the Occupy Wall Street protests against corporate greed: "It's resurfacing in a kind of poetic justice."

Will Jarvis and Tinbete Ermyas produced and edited this interview for broadcast.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Reddit WallStreetBets Founder Calls GameStop Stock Frenzy A 'Symbolic Movement' - NPR )
https://ift.tt/3rapMCS
Business

Amazon Faces Familiar Opponent in Alabama Union Election - The Wall Street Journal

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Amazon Faces Familiar Opponent in Alabama Union Election - The Wall Street Journal )
https://ift.tt/2NJvqNC
Business

The GameStop short squeeze was 'the grand awakening': expert - Yahoo Finance

InvestorPlace

7 Tech Stocks That Could Be the Future FAANG

A few months ago, I began prodding around the idea of, “What are the future FAANG stocks?” We’ve seen Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and other tech stocks swell from modest winners to worldwide behemoths. These stocks went from $100 billion to $1 trillion in market capitalization. So many people talk about what it would be like if we had bought Apple in the 1980s or Amazon in 1999. While anyone who did and was able to hold on until now is ridiculously rich, they also sat through a ton of volatility. InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice & Trading Tips Further, investors could have waited until after Apple’s iPhone moment or Amazon’s clear dominance of e-commerce and still made a 10x or more return on their investment. Don’t believe me? Apple is up over 1,000% over the past decade, while Amazon is up 1,760%. Over just the last five years — when it was absurdly clear these two were established leaders — Apple and Amazon are up 463% and 442%, respectively. That led me to ponder, what are the next tech stocks that could become new FAANG leaders? Specifically, I am looking for companies in the $50 billion to $300 billion market cap range that can go to $400 billion to $1 trillion or more. It’s an admittedly wide range, but who cares — these winners are right under our noses. Let’s look at seven tech stocks: 7 Safe Stocks to Buy for Solid Returns in Tumultuous Times PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) Adobe Systems (NASDAQ:ADBE) Tech Stocks to Buy for Future Gains: PayPal (PYPL) Source: JHVEPhoto / Shutterstock.com Current Market Cap: $295 billion Many investors have continued to underestimate PayPal. When it comes to FAANG tech stocks in their younger years, that seems to be a staple observation of them as well. However, PayPal has found a way to become a payment juggernaut. While sending money to friends and family is free and convenient, that’s simply one part of the ecosystem. The company also makes a sliver of sales when involving another business or merchant. It’s become a safe, trusted and convenient way for businesses to sell online or to make subscriptions a piece of cake. PayPal’s acquisition of Venmo and Honey have only added to those layers of engagement, while e-commerce will continue to be the main catalyst behind its growth. For those looking at tech stocks, the power and trend of e-commerce doesn’t need to be explained. Lastly, PayPal’s now in the cryptocurrency game, allowing customers to buy and sell Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Etherium and Litecoin. Maybe PayPal won’t be able to collect its current “fee” — read: commission — on these transactions forever, based on how stock commissions vanished almost overnight in the brokerage industry. However, for now it should act as an additional growth catalyst. Bonus: At a $100 billion market cap, Square (NYSE:SQ) could also be a consideration as a member of new FAANG tech stocks in this respect. Salesforce (CRM) Source: Bjorn Bakstad / Shutterstock.com Current Market Cap: $206 billion. It should go without saying that given the massive gains the stock market has registered over the past nine months, the ideal scenario would be a sizable correction for several of the stocks on this list. However, that doesn’t apply to all of them. Take Salesforce for example. This company keeps on printing money as revenue continues to chug higher. For all the doubt that Salesforce has endured over the years, it has done quite well. It doesn’t seem like management plans on stopping, either. For instance, management is looking to generate $60 billion in revenue by 2034. Most recently, it aims to scoop up Slack (NYSE:WORK), growing its workstation presence and scaling up its fight against Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT). 8 Cheap Stocks to Buy With Your Next Stimulus Check As we are talking about pullbacks, Salesforce is a great example. At the recent low, shares were 25% off the highs. That seems like a great opportunity for a company that continually sports 20%-plus revenue growth. Nvidia (NVDA) Source: Sundry Photography / Shutterstock.com Current Market Cap: $335 billion Admittedly a bit larger than what we were looking for, Nvidia needs to be included on this list. Almost every major technological trend is growing in demand. More internet traffic is creating strain in the cloud, increasing demand for edge-cloud computing. More data is creating more need for datacenters. Increasing self-driving vehicle capabilities demand more computing power. Better computers demand better graphics. The list goes on and on and Nvidia is there at every turn. The company’s products cater to multiple end markets with impressive secular growth. That’s why, despite the pandemic, Nvidia saw such an extreme acceleration in both earnings and revenue. Its savvy M&A strategy has allowed it to add high-quality names like Mellanox at reasonable valuations. Now Nvidia is going after Arm, a massive $40 billion deal. Nvidia is already nearing an unstoppable state, but with Arm it would be a juggernaut. From a pure antitrust perspective, Nvidia should be fine. However, this “juggernaut” position might cause some hiccups. Either way, this is a high-quality name that will only grow in size over time. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Source: Sundry Photography / Shutterstock.com Current Market Cap: $111.5 billion For Nvidia’s smaller sibling, we have Advanced Micro Devices. At about one-third the size, AMD has quickly climbed the ladder while drastically improving its financials. CEO Lisa Su has orchestrated one of the most impressive comeback stories in the stock market. Once left for dead, AMD was trading firmly below the $2 mark in 2016. Now sporting a 52-week high of $99-and-change, the leadership has been stellar. Like Nvidia, AMD is situated in multiple secular growth themes as rising demand in technology results in rising demand for AMD. Also like Nvidia, AMD saw a massive rise in revenue and profit during the pandemic. In one last final comparison to Nvidia, AMD is also working to close a large acquisition. In October, the company agreed to acquire Xilinx for $35 billion. 9 Stocks Selling at a Discount Right Now While it would require years worth of more growth, it’s not hard to imagine AMD growing to the size of Nvidia ($300 billion). Eventually clearing this level could put it on the lower end of the FAANG status in terms of its size. Roku (ROKU) Source: jejim / Shutterstock.com Current Market Cap: $53 billion Roku is a tough one, because it’s certainly the smallest name on this list (by a lot) and it just went on a massive rally. Shares are up 90% over the past three months, as Roku has climbed from a market cap of just $28 billion to where it is today. Additionally, investors just don’t understand this company. They still think it’s going head-to-head with Amazon with its stick players. While that’s kind of true, the story behind Roku isn’t the hardware — it’s the platform. Roku doesn’t care if it’s making money on the hardware. Instead, its focus is on the platform, where it collects fees from content providers and on ad revenue from its free Roku channel. In that respect, growth continues to explode. Analysts expect roughly 50% revenue growth this year, followed by 40% growth in 2021 and 36% growth in 2022. Respectfully, I believe that may be conservative. Bulls will acknowledge that a pullback may be in order (and a potentially large one at that). However, I don’t think the top is in for Roku. For AMD I mentioned the “lower end of the FAANG status,” which would be Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). Currently, that’s a $250 billion market cap and remember, NFLX is at a new high. I could see a scenario where Roku pulls back 20% to 25% — giving it a roughly $40 billion market cap — and ultimately roaring on to a $200-plus billion entity. Shopify (SHOP) Source: justplay1412 / Shutterstock.com Current Market Cap: $145 billion There is one problem with Shopify and several other names on this list: The rallies. While the massive rallies great for long-term investors, it makes the stocks susceptible to large pullbacks as well. If and when we get those declines, that’s investors’ opportunity to pounce. For Shopify, the bullish reasoning is multifold. First, Shopify is riding a much large trend — e-commerce — and therefore will continue to benefit from robust growth. When the coronavirus hit, sales were not negatively impacted. Instead, merchants flocked to its platform, driving Shopify’s revenue higher. Second, it’s building out the anti-Amazon business platform — giving merchants big and small power and control of the customer experience. Now the reward here is massive, as Shopify builds out multiple business segments likes shipping, credit, Shopify Pay and others. However, the risk is present as well. That is, can these companies that crave independence from Amazon delivery quality experiences for the customer? In the end, businesses and merchants are at least willing to try. In December 2019 I said investors could buy Shopify despite its lofty valuation. My argument centered on its valuation, saying this name could go from a $40 billion market cap to a $100 to $120 billion market cap in a decade. 7 Safe Stocks to Buy for Solid Returns in Tumultuous Times It was not obvious that the more than tripling in its value would take place in just a few months. In the long, long run, it’s not hard to imagine this name being significantly higher. Adobe Systems (ADBE) Source: r.classen / Shutterstock.com Current market cap: $228 billion Last but not certainly not least is Adobe. This company does a lot more than just Flash or Photoshop. It’s become a mainstay in e-commerce while also becoming a beacon in the graphics, digital and creative landscape. Find me a freelance graphic designer who’s not using Adobe. The stock has quietly racked up enormous gains as well. Adobe is up 140% over the past three years and 430% over the past five years. Over the last decade, the stock has rallied more than 1,300%, as its market cap was around $16 billion just 10 years ago. That’s some impressive action and Adobe doesn’t show many signs of letting up. Analysts expect double-digit earnings and revenue growth this year and next year, while the company gross margins remain solidly above 85%. While its top-line margins have been steady, its bottom-line profit margins have been soaring. Adobe is quickly yet quietly becoming a technology juggernaut right in front of us. Like some others on this list, the stock has been consolidating nicely over the past six months or so. Let’s see if this name can resolve to the upside. On the date of publication, Bret Kenwell held a long position in AAPL, ROKU, CRM and NVDA. Bret Kenwell is the manager and author of Future Blue Chips and is on Twitter @BretKenwell. More From InvestorPlace Why Everyone Is Investing in 5G All WRONG Top Stock Picker Reveals His Next 1,000% Winner It doesn’t matter if you have $500 in savings or $5 million. Do this now. The post 7 Tech Stocks That Could Be the Future FAANGÂ appeared first on InvestorPlace.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( The GameStop short squeeze was 'the grand awakening': expert - Yahoo Finance )
https://ift.tt/3pAx9mA
Business

How GameStop went from dying relic to 'meme stock' - Business Insider - Business Insider

Vaccines For Data: Israel's Pfizer Deal Drives Quick Rollout — And Privacy Worries - NPR

Israelis receive a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine from medical professionals at a vaccination center set up on a mall parking lot in Givataim, Israel, during a nationwide lockdown to curb the spread of the virus, on Jan. 20. Oded Balilty/AP

Oded Balilty/AP

How has tiny Israel beat out bigger countries on COVID-19 vaccinations, securing a steady stream of vials and inoculating a larger share of its citizenry than any other nation?

Israel paid a premium, locked in an early supply of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines and struck a unique deal: vaccines for data.

The nation of some 9 million promised Pfizer a swift vaccine rollout, along with data from Israel's centralized trove of medical statistics to study "whether herd immunity is achieved after reaching a certain percentage of vaccination coverage in Israel," according to their agreement.

"We said to Pfizer ... that the moment they give us the vaccine, we'll be able to vaccinate at the speed they've never heard of," Israel's health minister Yuli Edelstein tells NPR.

Israel's small size and technologically advanced public health system offer an attractive model for Pfizer to demonstrate the impact of the vaccine on an entire population. Pfizer has not signed a similar agreement with any other country, company spokesperson Jerica Pitts says.

The vaccines-for-data tradeoff has sparked impassioned debate in Israel among data privacy experts, biotech researchers and the country's own medical ethics board, weighing the potential benefits of mining the population for vaccine insights against the potential abuse of millions of personal medical records.

"We need to understand that [Israel's agreement with Pfizer] is going to be one of the, I would say, widest medical experiments on humans at the 21st century," says the Israel Democracy Institute's Tehilla Shwartz Altshuler, a data privacy advocate and a leading voice questioning the Pfizer data deal.

Some Israeli commentators have accused Shwartz Altshuler of seeking to spoil a successful national campaign that the government has branded with the hashtag "VacciNation." She and many other Israeli experts tend to concur that quick access to the vaccine is Israel's most important priority.

Israel is already reporting promising initial results of the vaccination campaign. The Health Ministry said Thursday that out of a group of 715,425 Israelis fully vaccinated, only 317 — 0.04% — got infected with the virus at least one week after their second shot, and 16 were hospitalized with serious symptoms.

Israeli HMOs have reported a decrease in infection rates among those vaccinated with one shot of the Pfizer vaccine, and a drop in the country's serious COVID-19 infections for older age categories a couple of weeks after Israel started its national vaccination drive.

"I think that it's really very special that Israel's been recognized by Pfizer as a country that the whole world can learn from," says Diane Levin-Zamir, director of health education at Israel's largest HMO, Clalit Health Services. "There's good research coming out and we're being very transparent about the data."

Vaccines and politics

Most Israelis are celebrating their record-setting vaccination drive. "To be the first place in the world, it's a good feeling," says Yoni Boigenman, an Israeli getting a first shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine at Jerusalem's main sports stadium, which has been converted into a hive of needles and nurses 14 hours every day.

Close to a third of the population has received at least one shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and about 17% received both shots, far beyond any other country. Israel aims to be the first to vaccinate most of its citizenry against COVID-19 before elections are held March 23.

The vaccine drive is central to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's reelection campaign. The first Israeli to receive a shot, Netanyahu mounted his syringe in a glass box, the needle angled upward like a rocket ship, with a plaque riffing off the words of U.S. astronaut Neil Armstrong: "One small shot for a man, a giant step for everyone's health."

Israel has waved away human rights groups' assertions that the country is obliged to provide vaccines to Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip; Israel says the Palestinian Authority holds that responsibility.

Still, Israel has decided to send 5,000 COVID-19 vaccines to Palestinian medical workers in the West Bank, with an initial shipment this week, Defense Minister Benny Gantz's office tells NPR. Palestinian officials signed late deals with vaccine manufacturers and still await shipments to begin vaccinating the public.

Some Israeli medical experts warn that widespread immunity cannot be achieved so long as millions of Palestinians are not vaccinated. Palestinian officials say they do not expect to vaccinate the majority of their population until at least the end of the year.

"It's a gold mine"

Nearly every Israeli citizen and resident belongs to one of four public HMOs, a health care system rooted in the national trade union of Israel's early years. Every Israeli's full medical history – from physician visits to hospitalizations – is accessible to any health provider at the click of a mouse, a repository of digital records going back 30 years.

"It's a gold mine," says Ziv Ofek, who helped launch Israel's public health database, which he asserts is unparalleled by any other country.

Unrelated to the Pfizer study in Israel, Ofek's medical data company, MDClone, is helping assemble a separate Israeli coronavirus patient database, with privacy protections. Israeli researchers are already tapping it for insights, such as findings that suggest a higher likelihood of dying from COVID-19 among those with fatty liver disease.

The data offers potential for vaccine research, too.

"Is there any progression of other diseases? ... Does it impact your hypertension?" Ofek says. "All you need to do is just to be able to load the fact that you've been vaccinated, and then you can run new studies."

Privacy concerns

The Israeli Health Ministry initially kept the terms of the Pfizer agreement confidential, but on Jan. 17 published part of the English-language contract, dated Jan. 6, to reassure the public about data use. Instead, the fine print has raised further questions.

Israel's medical data experts want to know exactly what Israel is giving Pfizer, and whether the data being studied amounts to a clinical trial without the express consent of the millions of Israelis rushing to get vaccinated.

In interviews, Israeli officials insist they are only giving Pfizer anonymous statistics already provided to the public, such as the number of weekly cases and hospitalizations.

Pfizer said in a statement that it "will not receive any identifiable individual health information. The [Israeli Ministry of Health] will only share aggregated epidemiological data."

But the contract says Israel will give Pfizer unspecified "subgroup analyses and vaccine effectiveness analyses, as agreed by the Parties," leaving open the possibility that more personalized categories of data could be delivered.

"Can you have a real research based on ... statistical numbers? This is not research," Ofek says. Israeli health officials "claim they don't give patient-level data, only statistics. There's a big question whether it's the whole truth, part of the truth or no truth at all."

Privacy and medical data experts say buckets of data scrubbed of patients' personal details can still be traced back to identify people if the sample is small enough, revealing sensitive medical details such as who is HIV-positive. If Israel transfers such private data to Pfizer, there are concerns it could get hacked and disseminated by third parties.

"Your insurance company will know all your medical history. Your employer will know it. The political campaigner who would like to convince you to vote for someone would know everything about your medical history, not to say about people who would like to marry your children," warns Shwartz Altshuler, describing what she calls a small concern.

The contract also allows Pfizer or Israel to "provide input, make factual corrections" and delay publication of their studies of the vaccine's effectiveness, which some Israeli medical data and privacy experts say could allow either party – each with vested commercial and political interests in the vaccine's success – to hide or delay publication of failures. A Pfizer spokesperson did not respond to NPR's query on this matter.

The head of Israel's medical ethics review board, Dr. Eitan Friedman, says the review board has requested further clarification on the agreement. The government has not officially responded to the board's request to review the agreement, he says.

If Pfizer and Israel are studying response to the vaccine by subgroups of Israelis' demographic profiles and medical conditions, it should qualify as a clinical study requiring his board's approval, says Friedman.

"There needs to be total transparency. No one party can override the real data. We need to know the truth," he says.

The data study and fast vaccine rollout have fed some suspicions. Skepticism among the vaccine is prevalent among Palestinian citizens and residents of Israel.

"I heard so many rumors about this. Some say ... they want to see the experience on the people here, if it's a good vaccine or not. That's why I'm a little confused about it," says Nuha Sharif, a Palestinian resident of Jerusalem who nevertheless came to the Jerusalem sports arena to get her shot.

She has Israeli health insurance and received the vaccination for free, unlike Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza who are still waiting for vaccine manufacturers to deliver vials to the Palestinian territories.

Some Israelis getting shots at the arena say they are not worried about their data.

"If it can help the world to get out of it, I don't care," Noam Ben Dror says. "I don't think it's a big secret, my personal data."

Sami Sockol contributed reporting from Jerusalem.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Vaccines For Data: Israel's Pfizer Deal Drives Quick Rollout — And Privacy Worries - NPR )
https://ift.tt/2Yu5SX9
Business

O.J. Simpson gets COVID vaccine in Nevada - New York Daily News

Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries. We are engaged on the issue and committed to looking at options that support our full range of digital offerings to the EU market. We continue to identify technical compliance solutions that will provide all readers with our award-winning journalism.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( O.J. Simpson gets COVID vaccine in Nevada - New York Daily News )
https://ift.tt/2L5cMPr
Business

With GameStop, Reddit and Robinhood gamified the stock market - Quartz

The stock market turned into a spectacle to rival Super Bowl LV this week, as retail investors and hedge funds faced off over GameStop stock. Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes will have a hard time providing as much entertainment to viewers around the world as this latest step in the gamification of financial markets.

Punting on stocks has always had a sporting element: the thrill of placing a bet and watching the game play out. But financial markets now offer a chance for combat as well as entertainment. The element of combat was introduced with the proliferation of hedge funds that actively short stocks to hedge their positions.  Widespread shorting—when you borrow a share, sell it, and hope to buy it back at a lower price—ensures that longs (owners of the stock) are set against shorts in a zero-sum game. With the morality tale of good individual investors on Reddit battling the evil hedge funds shorting stocks, the game was complete. In a populist moment, what could be more fun than seeing lethal combat between individuals and institutions, outsiders and insiders?

How did the gamification of financial markets happen? There are many culprits, including a bored and socially distanced workforce staring at screens during a pandemic, and low interest rates that make traditional saving silly and borrowing to buy stocks cheap, but the most important is the resurgence of the retail investor. You can’t fully gamify an industry without finding a technology to allow many new players.

In the last five decades, institutional investors became the dominant force in financial markets. The rise of defined benefit plans and then the switch to defined contribution plans consolidated market power among the mutual funds where workers invest retirement assets and the hedge funds that promise pension plans and endowment managers exorbitant returns. But that changed two years ago.

A fundamental change in the business model of financial brokerages brought the retail investor back: the rise of zero-commission trading. Commissions were already under pressure as new entrants—notably Robinhood—were funded by venture capitalists eager to find another industry to disrupt with bountiful capital. Brokerages realized that their business model was upside down. They didn’t need to charge their customers commissions to make money; there was much more money to be made by not charging their customers. The allure of “free”—demonstrated by Facebook and Google—was far greater than conventional business models.

As we’ve learned from the internet, what appears to be free is far from it. Just as Facebook and Google monetize user information by selling advertising, Robinhood and all the brokerages that have migrated to zero-cost commission capitalize on information. But there’s a twist. The brokerages don’t sell their users’ information; they sell their lack of it. The fundamental problem for market makers in financial markets is the danger of transacting with people with information—no one wants to trade with someone with more information because they know they’ll lose. That problem is what gives rise to so-called bid-ask spreads (the difference between the price at which you can buy and sell an asset) as these spreads reward market-makers for the risk of transacting with informed traders.

Robinhood and other zero-cost brokerages monetize their hold on active traders who are decidedly uninformed. They sell these trades to a new generation of market makers, like Citadel Securities, who pay for the ability to realize a bid-ask spread without taking the risk of trading with informed traders. Retail investors get to trade for free, the new generation of Wall Street behemoths like Citadel monetize their ignorance, and the old-line investment banks that used to pocket that bid-ask spread have moved on to becoming, like Goldman Sachs, some combination of a commercial bank and a hedge fund. Fun is had by all.

The gamification of financial markets comes with many costs. This will end badly for the retail investors, though it is not clear exactly when and how, and some will make money along the way. In the process, financial markets will do what they have done for centuries, though it is little acknowledged: reallocate wealth from the uninformed to the informed. Every bubble is associated with redistribution, and much of the alpha that professional investors boast about is nothing more than timing gains that are redistributions from other parties. The current populist moment in financial markets, like many other populist moments, will only serve to amplify that redistribution toward the rich and informed, all the while suggesting that it is doing the opposite.

Even more is at stake for the real economy. Financial markets are meant to provide price signals that help allocate resources and to provide mechanisms for funneling capital from savers to firms that need that capital. Gamification reduces those important functions to a sideshow. As retail investors reckon with their losses, they will lose faith in the valuable functions financial markets provide.

As with Facebook, or any seemingly “free” market, putting the genie back in the bottle will not be straightforward. It isn’t obvious how to regulate a market where participants are willingly trading their attention. Individuals are not being charged anything, and there is no obvious informational edge that is being capitalized on unfairly. Yet losses will arise over time and financial markets will suffer a further loss in credibility. Until that reckoning, your long-run health will be best served by being a fan and not a player—if you can stomach what the game is doing to the players, that is.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( With GameStop, Reddit and Robinhood gamified the stock market - Quartz )
https://ift.tt/3j2Uxqk
Business

Hyundai execs wary of Apple electric car partnership: Report - Business Insider - Business Insider

Mets owner Steve Cohen leaves Twitter, citing threats and "misinformation" - CBS News

The owner of the New York Mets says he has dropped off Twitter because his family received threats that he attributed to "misinformation" that was not tied to the baseball team.

Steve Cohen's hedge fund, Point72, has become entangled in market turmoil that has pitted a band of small investors against traders that made bets against — or "shorted" — stock of companies, including GameStop.

Hedge funds that shorted GameStop have lost billions as small investors bid up the company's shares. One of the short sellers, Melvin Capital, announced this week that it received a $750 million infusion from Point72.

"I've really enjoyed the back and forth with Mets fans on Twitter which was unfortunately overtaken this week by misinformation unrelated to the Mets that led to our family getting personal threats," Cohen said Saturday in a statement issued by the Mets. "So I'm going to take a break for now."

The hedge fund billionaire told Mets fans, "We have other ways to listen to your suggestions and remain committed to doing that." He added that this week's events would not affect the team's resources.

Cohen first took a stake in the Mets in 2012. Last year he gained 95% ownership in a deal that valued the club at $2.4 billion, a record sale price for a Major League Baseball team.

The Mets tied for last place in the National League East division last season. This month, the team fired its newly hired general manager after reports that he had sent explicit and unsolicited messages to a female reporter several years ago.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Mets owner Steve Cohen leaves Twitter, citing threats and "misinformation" - CBS News )
https://ift.tt/2YtBfAO
Business

Buy the Tesla Dip? This 5-Star Investing Guru Just Did - Motley Fool

Shares of Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) climbed more than 700% in 2020. However, that has some people wondering whether the stock isn't due for a downturn. Indeed, those concerns took shape last week, as Tesla's stock fell steadily to drop below the $800 per share level by Friday.

For many who have a big profit on a stock position, a decline might prompt some modest profit-taking or even a full-scale liquidation of their holdings. But for ace investor Cathie Wood at ARK Invest, the dip in Tesla was an opportunity to buy -- and buy she did, without hesitation.

Tesla white charging station.

Image source: Tesla.

Sell high, buy low

Wood has been a big fan of Tesla for a long time. Several of her active exchange-traded funds  have substantial holdings in the stock. Specifically, the ARK Innovation ETF (NYSEMKT:ARKK) and the ARK Next Generation Internet (NYSEMKT:ARKW) both have almost 10% of their assets invested in the electric automaker.

Last week, the two ARK ETFs trimmed their positions in Tesla. Some might have concluded from just watching that single week of activity that Wood might be losing her confidence in the stock.

But Wood reversed course on Jan. 29, taking advantage of the share price decline to buy back some of the shares she had sold the previous week. ARK Innovation bought more than 85,500 shares of Tesla on Friday, representing about 0.3% of the fund's total assets. ARK Next Generation Internet made a similarly sized buy in proportion to the smaller size of the fund, picking up almost 23,500 shares.

How much money did ARK Invest make?

With active ETFs, we don't get real-time information about the purchases and sales that fund managers make. However, the funds are required to give their positions each day, and ARK Invest reveals the exact number of shares involved in each purchase or sale.

However, you can estimate the amount of the benefit to the fund that Wood's transactions produced. Tesla traded at $845 on Jan. 19 and $850 on Jan. 20, the days on which the ETFs sold Tesla shares. With Tesla closing Jan. 29 at $794, the fund could have saved $51 per share on the 85,500 shares ARK Innovation bought. ARK Next Generation Internet sold only 10,500 shares last week, but it could've saved $56 per share on the rebuy. Do the math and that adds up to $4.36 million for ARK Innovation and $588,000 for ARK Next Generation Internet.

The benefits of rebalancing

Interestingly, what Wood did is very similar to what most financial advisors recommend that people do with their overall investing portfolios. Essentially, Wood did a short-term rebalance. She sold Tesla shares when the percentage of the ETF portfolio got higher than she wanted. But when that percentage subsequently got too low, the funds bought shares to get back into balance.

You can see the same kinds of gains with broader rebalancing of your stock, bond, and cash positions. In years when stocks rise, selling a small portion at high prices to shift into lower-price assets reduces your risk level and cashes in on some profits. If the stock market goes down in a subsequent year, then rebalancing has you buy shares on the cheap.

What's next for Tesla?

Tesla inspires a lot of controversy, and there's no end in sight for that. Some still argue that Tesla's profits are artificially inflated by regulatory credits, masking the inherent weakness in its business. Others point to the immense optionality in Tesla's business, as well as the strong demand for its vehicles.

As for Wood, her prowess is in large part due to her investments in Tesla, but the automaker isn't the only stock that's performed well for her. Both ARK Innovator and ARK Next Generation Internet have earned five-star ratings from Morningstar, and the list of other holdings looks like a who's-who among rising giants of their respective fields.

Tesla shares have risen so much that shareholders need to expect pullbacks, and they could be much larger than what we saw last week. Yet for long-term investors who see value in the vision of CEO Elon Musk and the technology that Tesla has produced, those short-term fluctuations are primarily an opportunity to pick up shares slightly more cheaply.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Buy the Tesla Dip? This 5-Star Investing Guru Just Did - Motley Fool )
https://ift.tt/3cDRrIn
Business

Jordan Belfort, ‘Wolf of Wall Street,’ on ‘little guy’ stock wins: ‘It’s about time’ - Fox News

Jordan Belfort, the former stockbroker and convicted felon, weighed in Saturday night on last week’s GameStop-WallStreetBets-Robinhood saga.

Belfort, whose rise and fall on Wall Street was documented in the 2013 Martin Scorsese movie, "The Wolf of Wall Street," starring Leonardo DiCaprio, shared his observations during an appearance on Fox News’ "Watters' World," with host Jesse Watters.

Watters asserted that moves by Wall Street giants to convince retail trading platforms like Robinhood to halt trading on puny stocks like GameStop -- that "average Joe" investors had sent soaring via the Reddit community WallStreetBets-- was likely illegal.

"I think it goes beyond that," Belfort agreed – and warned the implications could be fatal for Robinhood.

DEFIANT REDDITORS BUY TIMES SQUARE BILLBOARD AS GAMESTOP STOCK SAGA RAGES

"When I first saw it happen … when I really investigated what happened," he said, "they broke a tremendous amount of laws …

"I think Robinhood’s out of business because the amount of lawsuits they’re gonna get right now, from every single person on both sides of it … They’ll say, ‘Wait, I couldn’t buy what I wanted to buy,’ or ‘I was forced to sell’ -- They’re done, Robinhood."

"Someone needs to go to jail, it’s true," he continued. "At first I wasn’t that upset but last night I saw that the shorts were still short and … It’s about time that the little guy gave it to Wall Street. It’s so gratifying to see. I’m still in shock of it actually happening."

"It’s about time that the little guy gave it to Wall Street. It’s so gratifying to see."

— Jordan Belfort

Watters then asserted that Wall Street pros had been served a dose of their own medicine and didn’t like it – and retaliated by moving to "crush" the "little guy" investors who made some money.

Belfort again agreed, noting how quickly the retail trading platforms had been shut down.

"They shut down these platforms for the little guy like the way Parler got shut down," he said, comparing the situation to that of a social media site that was popular with conservatives.

"Now, how about this one?" Belfort continued. "Google eliminated 100,000 negative reviews off of Robinhood. … I can’t believe the things that are being allowed to happen right now and it’s almost like Big Tech has impunity, Wall Street has had impunity."

"I can’t believe the things that are being allowed to happen right now and it’s almost like Big Tech has impunity, Wall Street has had impunity."

— Jordan Belfort

Regardless of how things play out in the days and weeks ahead, Belfort issued a clear warning to any novice investors who may be thinking about trying to make some fast cash.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Please be careful," he cautioned, "because at a certain point in time the party’s gonna end for these stocks and they’re gonna drop precipitously -- and unless you’re careful you’re gonna lose a ton of money."

He added one last observation as well.

"Until someone goes to jail for this," he said of last week’s market maneuvers, "it’s gonna keep happening again and again."

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( Jordan Belfort, ‘Wolf of Wall Street,’ on ‘little guy’ stock wins: ‘It’s about time’ - Fox News )
https://ift.tt/3j0B9KJ
Business

Saturday, January 30, 2021

The GameStop effect: businessman Ryan Cohen became a billionaire on Wall Street thanks to Reddit - Fairfield Citizen

This week, GameStop shares drove Wall Street crazy, due to a massive buyout by Reddit users. The stunt skyrocketed shares in the video game company, causing heavy losses for some and millionaire profits for others.

Such is the case of businessman Ryan Cohen , founder and former CEO of Chewy , an e-commerce of pet supplies. The 35-year-old investor became a billionaire, thanks to the plays of the stock market and the initiative of the 'redditors'. His fortune rose to an estimated 1.7 billion dollars (about 35 billion Mexican pesos).

GameStop's share price skyrocketed from the collective action of Reddit users , in a forum called 'Wall Street Bets' , with more than 4.5 million followers. There they organized to buy stocks against which hedge funds bet. The purchases sent GameStop shares down from $ 17 on January 1 to $ 469 on January 28 .

At the end of last year, Ryan Cohen invested about $ 76 million to buy more than 9 million shares of GameStop . His intention was to assist in the restructuring of the Texas-based company, which was on a losing streak.

"Unfortunately, it is clear that GameStop currently lacks the mindset, resources, and plan to become a dominant player in the industry ," Cohen said in a public letter to the board of directors of video game stores.

"GameStop needs to evolve into a technology company that delights gamers and delivers exceptional digital experiences, not remain a video game retailer that over-prioritizes its physical presence and stumbles on the online ecosystem ," added the former CEO of Chewy .

GameStop shares have risen more than 800% since Cohen made the remarks. Now, the value of his stake is 825 million dollars .

To that must be added the 3.4 billion he received in 2017, when he sold his company Chewy to PetSmart . Forbes estimates that the businessman is worth close to $ 1 billion . The investor also landed three seats on the GameStop board in early January, one for himself and two for former Chewy executives.

What awaits Ryan Cohen?

It's impossible to predict how long Cohen will stay on the billionaires list, because GameStop shares are more volatile than ever.

"Gamestop shorts and longs are in a knockout battle being fought in the stock market and on social media platforms ," Ihor Dusaniwsky, managing director of S3 Partners, told Forbes on Tuesday.

The specialist noted that short sellers betting against stocks have dropped about $ 5 billion this year .

"Both parties hold on with firm conviction, but in the end, one party will be the outright winner, and in the later rounds of this fight, the big shareholders are way ahead," Dusaniwsky said.

Related:
El efecto GameStop: el empresario Ryan Cohen se volvió multimillonario en Wall Street gracias a Reddit
The GameStop effect: businessman Ryan Cohen became a billionaire on Wall Street thanks to Reddit
Robinhood enfrenta una demanda colectiva por bloquear la compra de acciones de GameStop

Copyright 2021 Entrepreneur.com Inc., All rights reserved

This article originally appeared on entrepreneur.com

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( The GameStop effect: businessman Ryan Cohen became a billionaire on Wall Street thanks to Reddit - Fairfield Citizen )
https://ift.tt/3t5iKAS
Business

A Reddit Army Descends on Hedge Funds Chained by Risk Models - Yahoo Finance

(Bloomberg) -- A hellish week for hedge funds will be remembered for how much damage Reddit traders caused by chasing a handful of the most-shorted names in the $43 trillion U.S. stock market.

But just why were the institutional pros forced to downsize their market exposures at the fastest pace since pandemic-spurred March rout?

One reason is that their risk models told them to.

As a flood of retail money sent stocks like GameStop Corp. and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. surging, the trading signals that guide how the smart money invest flashed red.

Known as Value at Risk, this crude but widely used metric showed just how vulnerable the equity long-short crowd was to losses based on historic price moves.

As day traders battled Wall Street, volatility doubled in 50 companies on the Russell 3000 last week. At the same time, hedge funds’ most-shorted stocks rallied so hard that they outperformed their favorite longs to a degree that’s rarely been seen before.

With institutional clients to worry about, the pros duly cut positions across the board -- while retail investors, who are free from such constraints, charged on.

“When the risk models go haywire, you degross,” said Benn Dunn, who helps these managers monitor risk as president of Alpha Theory Advisors. “What the hedge funds are holding long, they have to get rid of to get their exposures down -- to get their risk in line.”

According to Morgan Stanley’s prime brokerage, the drop in hedge funds’ exposure last Wednesday was historic, according to a rule of thumb for a normal distribution of statistical data.

At 11 standard deviations away from the mean in data going back to 2010, this deleveraging was the fastest since the onset of the pandemic in March -- when there was the biggest move in a decade.

Value at risk, pioneered by JPMorgan Chase & Co. in the 1990s, tries to figure out the most a fund can lose in the vast majority of cases: like a maximum $50 million in a day, 95% of the time. While an individual might be free to stomach the risk of a large drawdown, hedge funds serving institutional clients like pensions are generally bound by a game plan that curbs extreme excesses.

The challenge last week for the smart money was that reliable trading patterns broke down. Let’s say a stock picker is short GameStop and long Peloton Interactive Inc. On most days, when both move in the same direction, one is a hedge for the other. Yet the former surged while the latter plummeted -- a negative and costly co-movement.

“If you’re short one and long something else, and the correlation comes down, that actually sends your risk up,” said Melissa Brown, global head of applied research at Qontigo, which provides tools for analyzing risk.

On Wednesday, an exchange-traded fund tracking hedge-fund darlings (GVIP) moved seven standard deviations from the mean relative to a Goldman Sachs Group Inc. basket of Russell 3000 stocks with the highest short interest. Based on 250-day data, that lies outside the statistical norm.

Of course, that’s based on a normal distribution of data, which famously does not hold, especially in complex modern markets. But it offers a simplified illustration of how the retail crowd caused unprecedented volatility on the institutional cohort.

There are multiple interlinked drivers of deleveraging and the dust has yet to settle as the retail crew charges anew into the most-shorted names. Beyond those forced to cut positions as higher volatility pushes up VaR, client redemptions and margin calls may have also exerted pressure.

But zoomed-out, the week’s frenzy might yet be another sign of a worrying trend in financial markets: the least statistically likely moves are happening more often, something known as fatter tails.

“I’ve seen selling in all kinds of places,” Dunn said on Friday. “You’re seeing things in the market that don’t make sense.”

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com

Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Article From & Read More ( A Reddit Army Descends on Hedge Funds Chained by Risk Models - Yahoo Finance )
https://ift.tt/39y2cK7
Business

Search

Featured Post

Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: American Airlines, AutoZone, GlaxoSmithKline and others - CNBC

In this article VIR TSLA GSK-GB DBI AZO AAL Check out the companies making headlines before the bell: American A...

Postingan Populer